4 ms·
Oh yes, I've heard a bit about the Amplituhedron. Unfortunately, it only serves to simplify the perturbative calculations in Yang-Mills theories order by order,
by codethief 6y ago
Oh yes, I've heard a bit about the Amplituhedron. Unfortunately, it only serves to simplify the perturbative calculations in Yang-Mills theories order by order, i.e. the Feynman diagrams. It doesn't describe the full (non-perturbative) theory, so it's not really a candidate for a replacement of "classic" local QFT.
- Raro 6y agoThank you for pointing this out; this accords with my recollection, but you clearly stated a fundamental issue with the approach in its current state. I thought of the idea as more a sketch of how things might be looked at with a perspective change, rather than a full-blown theory (at least in the form I saw it in 2014). I guess I was holding out for the (highly unlikely) possibility of an asymptotic limit or something similar. It just seemed to be rooted more in reality than most of string theory/LQG. Of course, that could be my bias towards novelty!
- codethief 6y ago> I guess I was holding out for the (highly unlikely) possibility of an asymptotic limit or something similar. It just seemed to be rooted more in reality than most of string theory/LQG. Of course, that could be my bias towards novelty! I totally understand! I was quite excited about the Amplituhedron, too, when I first read about it!