4 ms·
So I'm a little nuts in that I run 2 x 27" 4K monitors side by side with no scaling. 27" is about the smallest I can tolerate 1:1 pixel sizes. Since aging has
by slantyyz 6y ago
So I'm a little nuts in that I run 2 x 27" 4K monitors side by side with no scaling. 27" is about the smallest I can tolerate 1:1 pixel sizes.
Since aging has forced me into wearing reading glasses, I wear single vision computer glasses that are optimized for the distance range of my monitors' closest and furthest points.
Because I dont have scaling enabled, I don't get any of the HiDpi issues that I've gotten on my laptops with Windows.
I have found that I am still wanting for even more screen real estate, and for a time I had a pair of ultrawide 23" monitors underneath my main monitors, but it created more problems than it solved and I recently went back to only two monitors.
- swader999 6y agoI do the same with three but all in portrait mode.
- slantyyz 6y agoThat's an interesting idea. I should look into that when I eventually upgrade. A stubborn part of me left the monitors in landscape because I occasionally play games, but I end up never doing that on my desktop. Because I prefer to use the same model of monitor when doing a grid, so I don't think I want to add to my existing setup, because my monitors are discontinued, and they're displayport only for 4K60. I think they have more than a few years of life left in them, but I'll definitely look into a configuration like yours at upgrade time.
- swader999 6y agoI find it easier to look up and down than side to side. Too many ski and skateboard crashes with whiplash when younger.