2 ms·
You still need to scale the resolution to make it easily readable on most common monitor sizes like 27". The end result is really good and sharp.
by sgt 6y ago
You still need to scale the resolution to make it easily readable on most common monitor sizes like 27". The end result is really good and sharp.
- hadlock 6y ago27" x 1440p has been my go-to for a while now. Works well without scaling between win/mac/linux, does not dominate the desk completely, high quality monitors are readily available in this resolution etc etc.
- TylerE 6y agoI think my dream set up would be a 27" 1440P (What I currently have at home, with a pair of smaller (19" maybe?) 1080p screens on either side setup in portrait. Basically a similar screen area to 2x27", but without a bezel right in the center of my field of view, and the 1080x1920 screens will be a good size for displaying full page (e.g. PDF) at more or less full screen.
- mulmen 6y agoAt that point not just run an Ultrawide at 1440p?
- jablan 6y agoThe price is probably double.
- TylerE 6y agoI actually like having multiple screens. I know I'm weird in this but I actually like running certain apps maximized.. but I wouldn't want it maximized across a whole ultrawide. Plus, if I take a working vacation somewhere it's a lot more practical to schlep around one 24" or 27" than an ultrawide. Also, just as an ergonomic thing, I could angle in the two outer screens a bit while not having one of those icky curved screens.