4 ms·
Well, you need to acquire video of TGIF meeting from 2016 dedicated to search support for election. In question and answer section one of employees asks why for
by vl 6y ago
Well, you need to acquire video of TGIF meeting from 2016 dedicated to search support for election. In question and answer section one of employees asks why for many questions instant answer card is shown for Hilary and for same question not shown for Trump.
As for division-wide email from Senior VP declaring preference for specific election outcome (you don’t need to go to Standford to guess which one), I actually tried to look it up some time ago, but it was wiped-out since Google smartly deletes all internal emails older than 6 months specifically to avoid this kind of embarrassment.
- fzeroracer 6y agoI'm asking you, directly, for evidence. Since you claimed to have worked at Google during this time, you directly made the claim that implies you saw this occur with your own eyes.
- username90 6y agoI worked there when this happened and this is what they said: Google went to both Hillary and Trump campaigns and asked both of them for cards to display when searching for them. Hillary's campaign gave them cards, Trumps campaign didn't respond. Therefore there was no discrimination.
- vl 6y agoSo you are saying that search results were manipulated (cards were added) inequitably (added for one campaign and not other). Notice that is doesn’t matter why it happened. End result is the same: campaigns were inequitably represented in search results.
- vl 6y agoYes, and I described to you what and when.