> I probably never would have done it that way, I would probably use an interface type instead I think when you're all in the same package and accessing unexpo

> I probably never would have done it that way, I would probably use an interface type instead I think when you're all in the same package and accessing unexported fields you know about, this is much clearer than an interface. I often add unexported mutually exclusive fields that local code has advanced knowledge about to prevent unnecessary over-abstraction.