4 ms·
This is nice. I think crowd-sourced analysis is a massive resource that has not been investigated nearly enough. I would love to browse feedback on PubMed paper
by markkat 16y ago
This is nice. I think crowd-sourced analysis is a massive resource that has not been investigated nearly enough. I would love to browse feedback on PubMed papers, as it could really save time.
Perhaps by incorporating a Methods Exchange of some sort, you might be able to draw in the Life Science folk a bit more. Although we are cagey about our pubs, we are pretty open to talk about methodology. That could be a project of its own, but the angle might be worth considering.
Best of luck. Bookmarked.
- shaohua 16y agohey, nice idea. Can we talk more on this? Are you interested in working on such a project?
- markkat 16y agoHa. My wife would kill me if I was working on yet another thing. :) But if your looking for feedback, I'd be happy to share some. Email in my about.
- kvh 16y agoI think openprotocols.net is doing something along these lines, I remember seeing them mentioned here on HN. Yep: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2191105 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2191105