4 ms·
>That's why it should be freely configurable. This seems really, really entitled to me. There already IS a platform you can use that you can fiddle and tweak t
by ubermonkey 6y ago
>That's why it should be freely configurable.
This seems really, really entitled to me. There already IS a platform you can use that you can fiddle and tweak to your heart's content in Android. Apple's iOS is different, and runs on maybe 1/4 of the phones that Android does.
One feature of the Apple ecosystem is this walled garden effect. By what logic do you seek to compel this non-monopoly to make changes to their business model?
- _ph_ 6y agoI don't know whether this fallacy has already a name, but it should. Just because I think something could be improved about iOS, doesn't mean I didn't choose the platform I am using with care. Nor do I think that the business model of Apple is in danger, just because I can make a setting in which app to open a certain URL for example. Actually, as I am still a great fan of Apple, I think some of the suggestions have the potential to improve the business model of Apple.
- ubermonkey 6y agoI guess what I mean is that arguing that Apple should be forced to do this is entitled. You can want it all you want. That's not entitled to me. I do not think they will do it, because I do not think it will improve their business model, but as long as you're not arguing that they should be compelled to do it I have no issue.