4 ms·

I was thinking about 20 hours of actual battery life. Seeing as the A13 has the performance of 9900K in many cases (as mentioned in the article), I'm assuming i

I was thinking about 20 hours of actual battery life. Seeing as the A13 has the performance of 9900K in many cases (as mentioned in the article), I'm assuming it's pretty easy to achieve around 20 hours of battery life with an A13-based chip. That being said, you could argue that the sporadic and discrete nature of phone usage has nothing to do with continuous "strain" on the CPU in a Desktop usage which could change the consumption.

dr_zoidberg 6y ago
There's one thing that I've noticed and it's the memmory subsystem. SPECINT and SPECFP dabble on the "raw power" of the chip, and it'd seem in that area the A13 would be king, but as most "micro"-benchmarks go, we no from real world performance that they don't quite tell the whole story. So I went looking for performance numbers related to memmory, and found some anandtech tests[0], the summary being: * L1, L2 and L3 are comparable to AMDs 4900 processors (which I'll take as baseline for "best x86 mobile", with a grain of salt). * LPDDR4 1600 MHz vs AMD's LPDDR4 4266Mhz (dual channel, can't find if A13 is DC too, but I'd expect it to be). * RAM latencies in excess of 340ns, vs "65+"ns for AMDs. Let's take that as "sub 100ns" since they're not giving straight numbers[1]. * RAM bandwidth to memory in the order of 20-40GB/s depending access patterns. That places it around the x86 "counterpart" which is capable of "around" 25-50GB/s * Bandwidth in the caches is different too, but I didn't want to risk a bad interpretation on my side. It'd seem the Ryzen hits larger numbers (so better), but I admit I'm not used to reading these charts and feel a bit "out of the water" there. Seeing all that... I'm not sure the memmory system is on par to what x86 has to offer with its "best contender" right now. And let's also remember that Intel is still beating AMD in memory latency (which helps them drive better numbers in some "real world" benchmarks as we see in certain games, for example, where Intel still leads despite the "raw power" Zen2 has shown). My take is that a "slow memory system" could be a big drawback for a CPU in real world tasks, resulting in a chip that, on paper should be great, but once you sit at a computer to use it "feels slow". Of course this is complex to test and try, and far more than I can analyze sitting at home driving searches over the internet. [0] https://www.anandtech.com/show/14892/the-apple-iphone-11-pro-and-max-review/3 https://www.anandtech.com/show/14892/the-apple-iphone-11-pro... [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/15708/amds-mobile-revival-redefining-the-notebook-business-with-the-ryzen-9-4900hs-a-review/2 https://www.anandtech.com/show/15708/amds-mobile-revival-red...

dr_zoidberg 6y ago

There's one thing that I've noticed and it's the memmory subsystem. SPECINT and SPECFP dabble on the "raw power" of the chip, and it'd seem in that area the A13 would be king, but as most "micro"-benchmarks go, we no from real world performance that they don't quite tell the whole story. So I went looking for performance numbers related to memmory, and found some anandtech tests[0], the summary being: * L1, L2 and L3 are comparable to AMDs 4900 processors (which I'll take as baseline for "best x86 mobile", with a grain of salt). * LPDDR4 1600 MHz vs AMD's LPDDR4 4266Mhz (dual channel, can't find if A13 is DC too, but I'd expect it to be). * RAM latencies in excess of 340ns, vs "65+"ns for AMDs. Let's take that as "sub 100ns" since they're not giving straight numbers[1]. * RAM bandwidth to memory in the order of 20-40GB/s depending access patterns. That places it around the x86 "counterpart" which is capable of "around" 25-50GB/s * Bandwidth in the caches is different too, but I didn't want to risk a bad interpretation on my side. It'd seem the Ryzen hits larger numbers (so better), but I admit I'm not used to reading these charts and feel a bit "out of the water" there. Seeing all that... I'm not sure the memmory system is on par to what x86 has to offer with its "best contender" right now. And let's also remember that Intel is still beating AMD in memory latency (which helps them drive better numbers in some "real world" benchmarks as we see in certain games, for example, where Intel still leads despite the "raw power" Zen2 has shown). My take is that a "slow memory system" could be a big drawback for a CPU in real world tasks, resulting in a chip that, on paper should be great, but once you sit at a computer to use it "feels slow". Of course this is complex to test and try, and far more than I can analyze sitting at home driving searches over the internet. [0] https://www.anandtech.com/show/14892/the-apple-iphone-11-pro-and-max-review/3 https://www.anandtech.com/show/14892/the-apple-iphone-11-pro... [1] https://www.anandtech.com/show/15708/amds-mobile-revival-redefining-the-notebook-business-with-the-ryzen-9-4900hs-a-review/2 https://www.anandtech.com/show/15708/amds-mobile-revival-red...