4 ms·

CBC, Jan 1: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/china-pneumonia-outbreak-1.5412327 https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/china-pneumonia-outbreak-1.54... CBS, Jan 2: htt

by Steko 6y ago

CBC, Jan 1: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/china-pneumonia-outbreak-1.5412327 https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/china-pneumonia-outbreak-1.54... CBS, Jan 2: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-sarshttps://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50984025-virus-fears-as-mystery-pneumonia-outbreak-sickens-dozens-in-wuhan-2020-01-02/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-sarshttps://www.bbc.com/n... Forbes, Jan 3: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/01/03/a-mystery-pneumonia-has-afflicted-44-people-in-wuhan-china/#38ee32694c6c https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/01/03/a-mystery-p... BBC, Jan 3: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50984025 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50984025

koheripbal 6y ago
There are a couple of major difference in the coverage that still puts ZH way ahead. 1. The NUMBER of articles they ran on covid - was 100x any other MSM provider in Jan. 2. The depth of the articles, including first-hand reports from China. 3. They weren't buried in some BBC->Asia->China subsection of the website like in your examples. They were FRONT PAGE.
N1H1L 6y ago
Also, at that time there was a big tension between US and Iran. This is around the same timeframe that Iran shot down it's own civilian aircraft. So I really won't blame any MSM here - the Iran story was obviously the bigger story then.