Some people have pointed out that The Federalist was not demonetized after all, since they caved into Google’s demands to delete their comment section. But if T

Some people have pointed out that The Federalist was not demonetized after all, since they caved into Google’s demands to delete their comment section. But if The Federalist can be held responsible for its comment section then why should Google themselves enjoy Section 230 protection from their user’s contributions? I know there’s probably a legal distinction since Google is private but on principle this is clearly unacceptable.