3 ms·
I don't believe Rust is faster than C, but I would argue it's faster to develop new products in Rust vs. C, and easier to produce programs which don't have data
by bschwindHN 6y ago
I don't believe Rust is faster than C, but I would argue it's faster to develop new products in Rust vs. C, and easier to produce programs which don't have data races or invalid memory accesses.
- jonny383 6y agoSure, if you wrap everything in unsafe and/or import third party libraries (with the assumption they are also safe).