well, sure. certainly one of the costs of a dynamic language is the possibility of typing bugs, and those will likely grow linearly with the size of the code ba

well, sure. certainly one of the costs of a dynamic language is the possibility of typing bugs, and those will likely grow linearly with the size of the code base. the question is if those programs were written in statically typed languages, how the world would differ, in-full. for example, they may have been built faster or sloer. or they may have better or worse test coverage, affecting severe defect count overall. or you may have had to hire a different team, with tradeoffs. hard to say.