There's a tendency to try to pigeonhole NetBSD, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD (and sometimes DragonFly BSD and MirOS BSD) into neat little categories. Usually it is alo

There's a tendency to try to pigeonhole NetBSD, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD (and sometimes DragonFly BSD and MirOS BSD) into neat little categories. Usually it is along the lines of "the portable one", "the secure one", and "the PC one", but which desktop they notionally support is a similar attempt at classification. Avoid this. It's as superficial and wrong as classifying people into blondes, brunettes, and redheads. It's not how the BSDs differentiate.