Judging past work by the "obviousness" of the final solution is shallow, juvenile, and dismissive. Every problem is easy when viewed through the lens of of a n

Judging past work by the "obviousness" of the final solution is shallow, juvenile, and dismissive. Every problem is easy when viewed through the lens of of a nearly-complete solution. There have been a wide variety of published proposals for generics in Go [1], each of which seemed plausible but had some insufficiency. Who knows how many proposals were conceived but never left the developer's machine. If it's so damn obvious/you're so brilliant where's your proposal dated Jun 2010 (your 'decade lost') that "solves" generics? [1]: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/15292 https://github.com/golang/go/issues/15292