3 ms·

I'm not missing anything. I'm well aware of the value of type systems, as I am our current cultural decision to value speed over correctness. I'm not confident

I'm not missing anything. I'm well aware of the value of type systems, as I am our current cultural decision to value speed over correctness. I'm not confident that average level developers are able to ship features in Rust as quickly as they would in Go, which is the root of my point. Those building tools, which generally do not have the same success metrics with respect to speed and correctness, should use the language with a focus on safety and correctness. Those whose positions do not lend themselves to safety and correctness should not use that tool.

zozbot234 6y ago
> I'm not confident that average level developers are able to ship features in Rust as quickly as they would in Go Even if this was a genuine concern, they should still use Rust. Because it will be far easier to refactor the code that they ship into something that is safe and correct, compared to rewriting a Go codebase.
- alexbanks 6y ago
  We can agree to disagree. The whole point of my post is that I do not agree with your statement.