I'll give you an example: I have developed a free app for medical use. The app was requested by doctors, I didn't just make it up. When I submitted it, it was f

I'll give you an example: I have developed a free app for medical use. The app was requested by doctors, I didn't just make it up. When I submitted it, it was first denied because, according to the reviewer, it was "too simple". I appealed, and finally the app got accepted. Happy ending, all good. But that made me think also: what if they decided it was not worth publishing? I mean, there was not very much I could do to make it "less simple" really. I would have given up. But why should patients be denied of a useful service because one company has complete control of what goes and what does not go onto their phones? See it like you want to see it, but it's unacceptable.