4 ms·
After a decade at 30%, maybe Apple should reduce the cut? Economies of scale and all that...
by mperham 6y ago
After a decade at 30%, maybe Apple should reduce the cut? Economies of scale and all that...
- sebazzz 6y agoApple is public, shareholders might not like that.
- moogleii 6y agoIt already reduces to 15% after a year.
- djfdat 6y agoThat's only for subscriptions, right? Not every type of app can support that type of business model.
- threeseed 6y agoPeople really don't understand what that 30% is for. App Store is a "channel to market". So you're not paying for store hosting, payment features etc. You're paying for access to tens of millions of willing buyers.
- Hamuko 6y ago>You're paying for access to tens of millions of willing buyers. With Apple marketing your competitor's apps even if a willing buyer is specifically looking for your app by its exact name.
- vxNsr 6y ago> App Store is a "channel to market". The "channel to market" there is no other channel on the iphone.