4 ms·
I don’t think its that strange of an “accusation”. In fact I’d call it a “hypothesis”. DHH is a popular person. He gets people to change their behaviors when h
by cdolan 6y ago
I don’t think its that strange of an “accusation”. In fact I’d call it a “hypothesis”.
DHH is a popular person. He gets people to change their behaviors when he calls them out (see his prior Twitter rants, I can’t recall any examples other than Zoom, etc). DHH even admits that he is popular and may be able to get the rules changed for himself, which is probably a big reason he is being vocal - small developers do not have the same platform as a Formula 1 hundred-millionaire who also created RoR.
- saagarjha 6y agoHe might be a vocal person online, but I think accusing him of purposefully sabotaging his app's approval process without supporting it with evidence is reaching a bit.
- phaedryx 6y agoAgreed. Certainly fails the Occam's razor test for me.
- catalogia 6y ago'Hypothesis' and 'accusation' are not mutually exclusive. This hypothesis is an accusation.