3 ms·
It isn't supposed to be an exciting language. It specifically not fancy. Great for teams. Forced style consistency. Clear expectations. Difficult to mis-read co
by zerotolerance 6y ago
It isn't supposed to be an exciting language. It specifically not fancy. Great for teams. Forced style consistency. Clear expectations. Difficult to mis-read compared to most others. Terse, almost rude.
- enahs-sf 6y agoThere is a lot of beauty in go’s simplicity. Very straightforward to reason about what’s going on. I find it much easier on the eyes than java.
- _ph_ 6y agoGreat summary. If one has to maintain a program full of "exciting" code, or just come back to it after some years, one is extremely happy for code which is written in a clear, simple style. Unfortunately, I have had to deal with too much "exciting" code. So I am very happy with Go so far and this latest concept of generics seems to add the least amount of complexity for the problems it solves.