This guy who wrote a book on Magnetism says that Einstein has it wrong and that only by starting over at Tesla's model and moving forward can the physics of the

This guy who wrote a book on Magnetism says that Einstein has it wrong and that only by starting over at Tesla's model and moving forward can the physics of the universe be predicted well. According to the Tesla inspired model of the ELECTRIC universe, gravity is not a fundament field itself, but an emergent characteristic of "incoherent dia-electric acceleration". The guy who said this is Ken Wheeler. Whats also interesting is that this opinion is shared by pioneer of "Low-Energy Nuclear Reaction" Randal Mills. I've been told by the people in this space that the Mills paper provides a comprehensive model that is MUCH better at predicting certain binding energy states of nuclei. In comparison to the standard models all-over the place. It also solves problem of all the dark matter in the universe, which is simply an abundance of tiny hydrogens called hydrino's which contain an electron that has lost momentum and is zipping closer to the nucleus, thus making a more elctro-neutral particle that weakly interacts with other particles (WIMPS). If anyone has doubts on the standard model, I suggest checking out "Ken Wheeler" and Randal Mills. Fascinating and deep look at a minority consensus of the universe that appears to be MUCH simpler.