3 ms·
No, what I was saying is "I wonder if this will be yet another miss for them." >they should have known that before the study was performed I don't even think
by Tenoke 6y ago
No, what I was saying is "I wonder if this will be yet another miss for them."
>they should have known that before the study was performed
I don't even think that's necessarily true given how common the use of corticosteroids both with COVID and in comparable situations.
It was just something that amused me and now I regret including it in my comment as it seems to distract from the main bit of information I was conveying.
- danans 6y agoFrom your link: "“Corticosteroid treatment should not be used for the treatment of COVID-19 -induced lung injury or shock outside of a clinical trial,” the commentary concludes." So they're saying: don't use it until there is sufficient evidence that it works. That's not a "miss for them". It's a prudent and conservative recommendation, which is exactly the kind of recommendation they should be making.