The person responsible for the initial error is quoted in today's article. I singled him out in my comment. It takes more than one researcher to ignore a protoc

The person responsible for the initial error is quoted in today's article. I singled him out in my comment. It takes more than one researcher to ignore a protocol calling for a dosage 3x in excess of that used by any other study, then paper over the fact that this happened. >Well, no, actually a single doctor MIGHT have, during a single incident. You'll find that I used the word "likely", indicating a lack of absolute certitude. This is a statistically reasonable statement based on their dismal HCQ results. Please stick to material critique of the informational content conveyed.