4 ms·
It's not even clear that we don't have evidence. The study was retracted because the authors did not want to provide more details on where/how they obtained th
by hcknwscommenter 6y ago
It's not even clear that we don't have evidence. The study was retracted because the authors did not want to provide more details on where/how they obtained their data. Probably because they were contractually obligated not to use the data in the way that they did (they made some vague statements to that effect).
- ray991 6y agoYou might be interested in this article that tries to explain what happened - from my perspective it was nothing short of a scandal. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgisphere-who-world-health-organization-hydroxychloroquine https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/03/covid-19-surgi... Others studies by one of the authors (Sapan Desai) whose company Surgisphere is supposed to be behind the alleged fraud are being scrutinised and even his credentials are under question now - https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sapan-desai-lancet-study-hydroxychloroquine-mass-audit-scientific-papers https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sa...
- hprotagonist 6y agoi’d trust RetractionWatch here, which also has good coverage.