4 ms·
> but are still objectively bad compared to public transport For whom? Certainly not for the owner. > So no, it's not about what I want, it's about the underl
by lazyjones 6y ago
> but are still objectively bad compared to public transport
For whom? Certainly not for the owner.
> So no, it's not about what I want, it's about the underliying point of the whole thread: What I (or really we/our children) need other people to do.
You don't even have children. So you confirmed my interpretation: it's what you want from other people, not as you initially claimed what they need.
- allendoerfer 6y agoYou are refusing to accept, that I am talking within the context of this thread. There are some premises here, which I explained in detail and take for granted in further sentences I am writing. I refuse to define everything to first principle in every sentence, because your only goal seems to be to go one step further up and suddenly you are right. In that sense, you or anyone does not need to do anything at all, because you don't even have to live. But then this whole discussion becomes really pointless.