5 ms·
Can we please stop these histrionic comments.... that was a bad human mistake, and your comment reads like you are screaming on top of your lungs to throw all
by ardit33 6y ago
Can we please stop these histrionic comments.... that was a bad human mistake, and your comment reads like you are screaming on top of your lungs to throw all the results away.
But, does it invalidate the results of this trial at all?
If these results hold (by other studies), cutting death rates by 1/3rd is a huge positive result...
- jcahill 6y agoI clearly said draw no conclusions. I don't do histrionic. I have been following and archiving the pandemic the entire year.
- Someone1234 6y agoYour post started with: > This is the RECOVERY trial. They have already likely killed patients through gross incompetence That could be used as the dictionary definition of histrionical. "They" meaning an entire study group killed people? Well, no, actually a single doctor MIGHT have, during a single incident. You've over dramatised reality to the point of absurdity, thus histrionical.
- jcahill 6y agoThe person responsible for the initial error is quoted in today's article. I singled him out in my comment. It takes more than one researcher to ignore a protocol calling for a dosage 3x in excess of that used by any other study, then paper over the fact that this happened. >Well, no, actually a single doctor MIGHT have, during a single incident. You'll find that I used the word "likely", indicating a lack of absolute certitude. This is a statistically reasonable statement based on their dismal HCQ results. Please stick to material critique of the informational content conveyed.