7 ms·
Disclosure: Throwaway as I am a former employee. No inside knowledge in this case. > This guy deserves what was coming to him, I agree. And on the scale of u
by throwaway0616 6y ago
Disclosure: Throwaway as I am a former employee. No inside knowledge in this case.
> This guy deserves what was coming to him,
I agree.
And on the scale of users FB has, he is most assuredly not the only one like him on Facebook.
I wonder how many there are that the company has no idea about, that perhaps are in countries that are not so well connected that they will get a dedicated FB employee to look into, who frankly FB does not and will not give a shit about.
I am therefore having some trouble believing they did this entirely in good faith. How many others are there that they will do absolutely nothing about?
- bluesign 6y agoOfc it is not only good faith but I guess it is also a factor. They did it because: - It makes their platform more secure. - Good PR - Assisting LEO prevents future problems with new laws etc. - It is good faith In general decisions like this, always have multiple dimensions. Always it is calculated decision.