4 ms·

Facebook are masters when it comes to controlling the narrative (damage control is their expertise). There is almost certainly something else under the surface.

Facebook are masters when it comes to controlling the narrative (damage control is their expertise). There is almost certainly something else under the surface. I find it implausible that Facebook would care enough to go after a single individual. No matter how bad that individual was. If they did this for every criminal of that level who uses Facebook, they'd run out of money. They simply cannot do this. Whenever the media or a big company focuses on a single individual, it's never actually about that individual. It's either about some higher social concept or it's simply a PR stunt to control the narrative. I think anything of this sort which comes out of Facebook is more likely to be damage control. They probably came up with the narrative before they even implemented this backdoor. Facebook has teams of people whose entire job is covering Facebook's ass. Before Facebook even does something bad, they already figured out an excuse for it before they even started doing it. If they didn't have an alibi, they wouldn't even do the crime. That's the kind of operation they run. They preemptively create the narrative, then they act. Why do people treat Facebook as if it were a conscientious person?

WhyNotHugo 6y ago
Well, Facebook actively campaigns against privacy, and the FBI actively campaigns against encryption. This is great PR for themm to say that both privacy and encryption are bad and should be outlawed. Wouldn't be surprising at all if that's how they spin it.
- TheMblabla 6y ago
  >Facebook actively campaigns against privacy Source? I know FB is pretty bad with the privacy of users of it's own services, but I'd be curious to see how they've campaigned against privacy.
throwaway49872 6y ago
Why the stupid downvotes? For a for-profit company spending millions needs a justifications stronger than a penchant for vigilante justice. A lot of big companies have a proven history of quietly cooperating with cops, three letter agencies and military. That type of cooperation often leads to multi-million, even billion $ contracts and special favors from political power. What is facebook trying to achieve?
- blaser-waffle 6y ago
  > What is facebook trying to achieve? Good PR for stopping predators. Flexing their power in front the FBI and other tech firms. Trying to demonstrate how obliterating privacy can sometimes have upsides. Plus, it's clear that Brian Kil was a particularly bad actor and worthy of taking down.
  - KaiserPro 6y ago
    or, more obviously, that having a famous paedophile prancing around on its platform is bad for business. So knocking him offline is worth the cash.
aboringusername 6y ago
I think stories like these reinforce the idea that it's okay to develop certain technologies or adopt certain policies or create infrastructure to stop the bad guys. For example, there's a reason most justifications we've seen regarding mass surveillance or automatic recognition systems are boiled down to two things: stopping harmful material terrorism Of course, they take a topic that you wouldn't even dream or arguing against and using that against you. If they wanted to erode our freedoms to stop harmful material I'm sure most would likely accept that outcome as I feel they have done (AI/facial tech)
KaiserPro 6y ago
Facebook have spectacularly shit PR. The only reason the world isn't hating on them as much is because people need the platform to stay in touch during covid. They carry far less info about people than google, google literally are funnelling data to all sorts of shady companies, and yet people trust google more. Google literally tracks you across all of the internet, meatspace and beyond. Facebook can't do anywhere near as much (yet, ar glasses might change that) Zuckerburg's utter inability to deal with trump effectively is symptomatic of the PR incompetence at the top. They have no idea that the outside world might think ill of actions. They are continually surprised when shit blows up in thier faces. In short, no, FB are utterly terrible at controlling the narrative.

WhyNotHugo 6y ago

Well, Facebook actively campaigns against privacy, and the FBI actively campaigns against encryption. This is great PR for themm to say that both privacy and encryption are bad and should be outlawed. Wouldn't be surprising at all if that's how they spin it.

TheMblabla 6y ago
>Facebook actively campaigns against privacy Source? I know FB is pretty bad with the privacy of users of it's own services, but I'd be curious to see how they've campaigned against privacy.

throwaway49872 6y ago

Why the stupid downvotes? For a for-profit company spending millions needs a justifications stronger than a penchant for vigilante justice. A lot of big companies have a proven history of quietly cooperating with cops, three letter agencies and military. That type of cooperation often leads to multi-million, even billion $ contracts and special favors from political power. What is facebook trying to achieve?

blaser-waffle 6y ago
> What is facebook trying to achieve? Good PR for stopping predators. Flexing their power in front the FBI and other tech firms. Trying to demonstrate how obliterating privacy can sometimes have upsides. Plus, it's clear that Brian Kil was a particularly bad actor and worthy of taking down.
- KaiserPro 6y ago
  or, more obviously, that having a famous paedophile prancing around on its platform is bad for business. So knocking him offline is worth the cash.

aboringusername 6y ago

I think stories like these reinforce the idea that it's okay to develop certain technologies or adopt certain policies or create infrastructure to stop the bad guys. For example, there's a reason most justifications we've seen regarding mass surveillance or automatic recognition systems are boiled down to two things: stopping harmful material terrorism Of course, they take a topic that you wouldn't even dream or arguing against and using that against you. If they wanted to erode our freedoms to stop harmful material I'm sure most would likely accept that outcome as I feel they have done (AI/facial tech)

KaiserPro 6y ago

Facebook have spectacularly shit PR. The only reason the world isn't hating on them as much is because people need the platform to stay in touch during covid. They carry far less info about people than google, google literally are funnelling data to all sorts of shady companies, and yet people trust google more. Google literally tracks you across all of the internet, meatspace and beyond. Facebook can't do anywhere near as much (yet, ar glasses might change that) Zuckerburg's utter inability to deal with trump effectively is symptomatic of the PR incompetence at the top. They have no idea that the outside world might think ill of actions. They are continually surprised when shit blows up in thier faces. In short, no, FB are utterly terrible at controlling the narrative.