Appreciate the detailed reply. I understand the dissent better now - it's more nuanced than my initial impression was. The discussion in this thread has made m

Appreciate the detailed reply. I understand the dissent better now - it's more nuanced than my initial impression was. The discussion in this thread has made me fully appreciate, while this might be a step forward for human rights, these protections really do need to be explicitly codified in law as well. Not just because they're resting on fragile interpretations of existing law, but also because this interpretation wouldn't necessarily extend to bisexuals, asexuals, etc.