4 ms·
Windows Me was a strange beast. On some (most?) PCs it was an absolute disaster up to corrupting hard disks, on others it was a solid step up from win98. But
by hyperman1 6y ago
Windows Me was a strange beast. On some (most?) PCs it was an absolute disaster up to corrupting hard disks, on others it was a solid step up from win98. But you could never say beforehand how it was going to behave, even on 2 identical PCs. I never understood what triggered its abysmall behaviour.
Oh well, who cares now, it lies in its well deserved grave, I guess.
- nonamenoslogan 6y agoI have similar recollection of ME, on my personal 333MHz Celeron with 128mb of RAM laptop it ran fantastically, never had issues and was stable and while 2000/XP were also stable, ME was fast compared to 2000/XP on the same hardware. Other people I know couldn't get past a VxD error on the first install, others couldn't get faster K6 or PIII's to be stable with it. It was a love it or hate it thing--my opinion of Vista and 8.0 are similar.