3 ms·
Show me anything that Wikileaks released that did not, in some way, involve either a) a war crime, b) corruption, or c) spying. Wikileaks is not a judiciary bo
by fit2rule 6y ago
Show me anything that Wikileaks released that did not, in some way, involve either a) a war crime, b) corruption, or c) spying.
Wikileaks is not a judiciary body. It never had any intention other than to provide an ill-informed public (remember, the Iraq war was predicated on a lie) with enough data to make its own conclusion. Your authoritarian stance that only the government can decide its own secrets is fundamentally corrupt to the idea of a free, open society.
- slg 6y agohttps://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=lunch https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=lunch Also you are reading a lot into my comments. I have never said anything approaching "only the government can decide its own secrets". My belief is simply that secrets are not inherently bad. Revealing a state secret should only be done when the person publishing that information can point to a public good that will result from that information being revealed. How does knowing lunch orders from random DNC employees help reveal war crimes, corruption, or spying?
- fit2rule 6y agoThe corruption of the DNC is a very real thing. >How does knowing lunch orders from random DNC employees help reveal war crimes, corruption, or spying? Right, corruption never happens during lunchtime.