> Yes it is interesting. Most likely not what the lawmakers intended at the time, but the law itself doesn't limit the scope. There's a section in the majority

> Yes it is interesting. Most likely not what the lawmakers intended at the time, but the law itself doesn't limit the scope. There's a section in the majority opinion about this, actually - I would paraphrase it as "it's not surprising that broad outcomes are drawn from laws written in extraordinarily broad terms."