3 ms·
> The US Government, by omitting this video from evidence, is making a tacit admittance that he is a publisher. This doesn't, at all, follow. > Either he IS a
by joshuamorton 6y ago
> The US Government, by omitting this video from evidence, is making a tacit admittance that he is a publisher.
This doesn't, at all, follow.
> Either he IS a journalist/publisher and thus protected from prosecution for revealing evidence of real crimes
Not if he himself committed crimes to get the evidence.
- fit2rule 6y agoIndeed, there is very little actual evidence of him having committed crimes in order to function as a publisher - and yet there is massive amounts of evidence of him functioning perfectly well in his capacity as a journalist and a publisher without committing crimes, at all.