3 ms·
I don't know this is wholely true. Democrats and Republicans have been breaking rules of order for the last 20 or so years it seems, alternating based on who's
by nothal 6y ago
I don't know this is wholely true. Democrats and Republicans have been breaking rules of order for the last 20 or so years it seems, alternating based on who's in control.
- danaris 6y agoYou can throw that "both-sides-ism" right out the window, just like the Republicans threw all rules of procedure and decency. It's nothing but false balance at this point. Yes, Democrats might have occasionally pushed things a bit in previous Congresses, but I know for a fact that you cannot point to anything Democrats have ever done that's as egregious as Republicans actively colluding to a) prevent a sitting President from being allowed to appoint a new Supreme Court Justice to the bench, or b) prevent any legislation the opposing party proposes from being brought to the floor in any way, shape, or form for years, purely for political gain.
- zests 6y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_judicial_appointment_controversies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush_judicial_appoin...
- hhw 6y agoA philibuster is nowhere near the same level of obstruction as refusing to call a vote at all. It also hasn't been used to anywhere near the same frequency.
- koheripbal 6y agoYou can throw your biased partisanship right out the window. The data demonstrates pretty clearly that whomever holds control of both houses of congress, gets bills passed, regardless of which party, and even usually regardless of which party holds the presidency. [source](https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics)