> "You're absolutely allowed to discriminate based on hair color because it's not a protected class." The "not a protected class" counterargument is self-defea

> "You're absolutely allowed to discriminate based on hair color because it's not a protected class." The "not a protected class" counterargument is self-defeating because it suggests that discrimination was A-OK before that protected class was created by law. If illegality does not imply immorality, as is often said on HN, then conversely legality does not imply morality.