3 ms·
I'd interpret it as the supreme court isn't a political weapon to be used against or for a sitting president rather a tool to interpret law and the anti trump a
by antishatter 6y ago
I'd interpret it as the supreme court isn't a political weapon to be used against or for a sitting president rather a tool to interpret law and the anti trump appointee stigma was baseless.
- AdmiralAsshat 6y agoGorsuch has broken rank w/Trump maybe twice. The only other one that comes to mind was a case concerning the property rights of Indigenous People. But that's still voting with him like 90% of the time. And I don't think Kavanaugh has ever voted against Trump's interests yet. We know for a fact that both of them would very much like to overturn Roe v. Wade. So no, I don't think it was "baseless".