The fact there's so many ifs and buts shows this can't be a clear line. In the eyes of the law, it's about the intent of the action - which is why the ambiguity

The fact there's so many ifs and buts shows this can't be a clear line. In the eyes of the law, it's about the intent of the action - which is why the ambiguity at the Terms and Conditions level is probably for the best. Yeah, your first argument makes a lot more sense to normal situations, but mine was aimed at being an analogy to the example at hand from the article.