3 ms·
It helps a lot if you show through your words that you're aware of all the existing informed discourse on these things. Poverty is the cause at one level of abs
by Kye 6y ago
It helps a lot if you show through your words that you're aware of all the existing informed discourse on these things. Poverty is the cause at one level of abstraction. It's well-known among people who think hard about racism.
The best summary I've found is The Case for Reparations: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-case-for-reparations/361631/ https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/06/the-cas...
He doesn't actually call for reparations, but a lot of people dismissed it out of hand on that assumption.
It's an abridged list of where racism intersects with poverty over the last century or so, right up to the modern day. It's a long read, but you'll have a much better understanding of where people are coming from even if you still don't agree with them. I think he hoped people would read it and come to the conclusion that reparations are needed on their own. I did at least agree with his conclusion that more research is needed.
The anniversary of the bombing of Black Wall Street just passed, so pay special attention to the 1920s. The tools racists use change, but the effect remains.
- maxist 6y agoJust curious - which part of the OP's comment do you find uninformed? Forgive me but to me your reply sounds condescending. "Poverty is well-known among people who think hard about racism" - seems to translate to "yeah, considered poverty - but no - still racism"? The OP is saying that "you can't even critique looting/fires/violence any more without being labeled privileged/uninformed" - and then as a reply you're reiterating exactly the same thing with "much better understanding of where people are coming". As if understanding it makes it ok.