3 ms·

It’s not a breaking change.

• king_magic 6y ago
  ... uh, yeah, it is.
  • there_the_and 6y ago
    Nope. Any third party software that assumes a “master” branch always exists and is always the main branch was already broken.
    • ceceron 6y ago
      It's not broken. It just works under assumptions applicable to the most common use cases. I know that a software engineer will sneer about dependencies of this kind, but such assumptions really simplify reality/software/whatever. And yes, they are a pain in the ass when it comes to changes and that's why one should be careful with unnecessary changes.