3 ms·
It seems like the contracts were not priced correctly. If they were, it would not be possible to game them so easily.
by ashtonkem 6y ago
It seems like the contracts were not priced correctly. If they were, it would not be possible to game them so easily.
- GoblinSlayer 6y agoWhat is the point of such correct price? To resist criminals?
- recursive 6y agoThat's just one benefit. The main one is to run a sustainable business.
- ashtonkem 6y agoYou would also want to price the contracts effectively to improve margins. If certain routes are liable to be delayed more often, you will want to charge a higher premium for them or refuse to insure them. This would both reduce the risk of abuse, and increase profits.
- ajna91 6y agoThis is circular reasoning. It was possible to game them because the contracts were not priced correctly. We know the contracts were not priced correctly because it was possible to game them.
- pgwhalen 6y agoIt feels to me like you’re just saying the same thing in two different ways, and that the reasoning is not circular.