5 ms·
I prefer Rebol or Red VID dialect. Here's the same code in Red VID... Red [] view compose [ text (rejoin [{The sum of } figs: [1 2 3 4] { is:
by draegtun 6y ago
I prefer Rebol or Red VID dialect.
Here's the same code in Red VID...
Red []
view compose [
text (rejoin [{The sum of } figs: [1 2 3 4] { is: }])
answer: text {}
return
button "Push me to calculate" on-click [answer/text: to-string sum figs]
]
- pkphilip 6y agoBeen looking at Red and Rebol for a long time but unfortunately they can't get this to work in Linux (the last time I tried it)
- 9214 6y agoThat's not true. https://www.reddit.com/r/redlang/comments/dzobh0/latest_gtk_build/ https://www.reddit.com/r/redlang/comments/dzobh0/latest_gtk_...
- draegtun 6y ago@9214 pointed you to Linux GTK builds of Red. My example was tested in macOS so haven't tried it on Linux but you'll need GTK & 32bit compatibility libraries installed for it to work. Rebol/View as always worked on Linux though you will also need 32bit compat + Freetype libraries - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34524169/rebol-2-stopped-working-after-upgrading-to-ubuntu-15-10 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34524169/rebol-2-stopped... And there's a 64-bit Rebol 3 with R3-GUI from Atronix, which should only need Freetype library installed - https://www.atronixengineering.com/downloads https://www.atronixengineering.com/downloads The VID has changed a little bit over time. Here's the example in Rebol2 View... Rebol [] view layout compose [ across text (rejoin [{The sum of } figs: [1 2 3 4] { is: }]) answer: text {......} return button "Push me to calculate" 200x20 [ answer/text: to-string sum figs show answer ] ] And here it is in Rebol 3 / R3-GUI... load-gui view compose [ hgroup [ text (rejoin [{The sum of } figs: [1 2 3 4] { is: }]) answer: text {......} return button "Push me to calculate" on-click [ set-face answer to-string sum figs ] ] ] Both scripts above worked fine on my Ubuntu 18 Linux. NB. Rebol doesn't come with a SUM function so here's one defined... sum: func [s /local total] [ total: 0 forall s [total: total + s/1] total ]
- alexkarta 6y agoLooks nice. Never even heard about it. Indeed influenced by Lisp