4 ms·
This seems to be claiming that virtual memory wasn't invented -- or at least first implemented -- at Manchester for ATLAS. Is there justification for that, as
by gnufx 6y ago
This seems to be claiming that virtual memory wasn't invented -- or at least first implemented -- at Manchester for ATLAS. Is there justification for that, as opposed to when it was first commercially available or in service?
- Taniwha 6y agoI think that this was a time when lots of stuff was being invented, (and implemented for the first time) often by different people in different places at the same time. Certainly Burroughs' implementation of VM is VERY different from what we normally think of as VM - but then their architecture (a stack machine with tagged memory) is also very different