3 ms·
Whether you choose to trust them or not, they have a history of publishing content that is false and serves to advance and protect Russia's interests. One such
by octodog 6y ago
Whether you choose to trust them or not, they have a history of publishing content that is false and serves to advance and protect Russia's interests.
One such example on the Skripal poisoning: https://www.rt.com/news/452946-skripal-anniversary-truth-novichok/ https://www.rt.com/news/452946-skripal-anniversary-truth-nov...
If you want you can read more about RT and Sputnik here: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/research-analysis/weaponising-news https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/research-analysis/wea...
- bzb3 6y agoI don't trust them, in very much the same way I don't trust any other media outlet, since you'll find similar stories for any other online newspaper. But by singling them out, you make it sound like they are the worst, when they are basically average
- thatlongthrow1 6y ago>trustworthy as any other >are basically average These two claims you made are incorrect. Honestly this is a bit bizarre.