3 ms·
That article is well argued and I am inclined to agree. But then I noticed that we seem to strongly disagree on other topics. I find it fascinating that you ca
by fxtentacle 6y ago
That article is well argued and I am inclined to agree. But then I noticed that we seem to strongly disagree on other topics.
I find it fascinating that you can both see AI as what it truly is (a rebranding to solicit investment) yet still cheer for cryptocurrencies, which I personally believe to be not much more than a pyramid scheme to dupe those investors that buy in late. In my opinion, both AI and crypto are quite similar in the ways that they mislead investors by promising a golden future.
- seibelj 6y agoI am a longtime crypto guy, and totally 100% understand how you see the links. I have a very nuanced opinion on this, but it's difficult to explain briefly here. There are a lot of scams in crypto, but if you are a believer in Austrian economics and are not a fan of Keynesian theories, fiat currency, and the Federal Reserve, then Bitcoin / crypto is very attractive. But that's a separate discussion, unrelated to my opinion of AI and is primarily a philosophical issue. Cryptocurrency / blockchain is fascinating but we are not promising robots cleaning your house.
- fxtentacle 6y agoI agree that AI has been way worse with the overpromising. But when I hear IPFS = interplanetary file system and then wee how poorly it performs in practice and that it's mostly used for illegal content, I cannot help but think that the crypto side also likes to oversell their practical utility. I believe I have yet to see an application where the Blockchain is truly a critical component. In most cases, it seems that people end up caching its data in sql to speed things up, meaning that they're working on their own private copy now.
- Vinceo 6y agoWhy do you believe that cryptocurrencies are not much more than a pyramid scheme?
- fxtentacle 6y agoWith the current transfers fees, it is difficult to do much apart from rarely moving large payments. For old-school currencies, that would be called speculation. If you now consider that both the mining difficulty grows over time and the mining reward drops, then you clearly have a system with a built-in advantage for early adopters. So people buy in, wait a bit, then exit at a higher price. But that only works as long as you have a large enough stream of newcomers. I'd be willing to consider it an investment if there was some sort of inherent value on the other side, so if buying cryptocurrency gave you a claim of ownership on something real. But the critical fundament of cryptocurrency is that it's unrelated to the real world and only controlled by its members. In other words, the value of a cryptocurrency is determined exclusively by what people believe it should be.