7 ms·
Small note: this is openzfs specifically. If that makes them happy then good for them. Although I personally think that this is a waste of time and also dislik
by dependenttypes 6y ago
Small note: this is openzfs specifically.
If that makes them happy then good for them. Although I personally think that this is a waste of time and also dislike the moral high ground that they attempted to take (trying to take advantage of the current climate to advertise their virtues), as if these that do not change the terminology used are somehow morally inferior. I do wonder if that would cause some form of incompatibility (between existing zfs tools and other zfs implementations, including previous openzfs versions) but I presume that they were careful about that. In addition I am annoyed that they decided to censor the linked thread.
Edit: apparently it did not change any API names.
Edit2: Surely I am not the only one who finds it ironic that they are using GitHub - a company which supports ICE, right?