This is such a terrible take! > So I guess HR departments have to check naming conventions in programs now for misogyny / politically non-correct / possibly ra

This is such a terrible take! > So I guess HR departments have to check naming conventions in programs now for misogyny / politically non-correct / possibly racist terminology before release? Of course. Why is that a question? >If in a book a white man were enslaved by some Asian tribe, how would master/slave terminology be non-correct in describing the participants? Edit: xxxYes absolutelyxxx The terminology would be correct. But that's fiction. This is real life with real consequences. The reason it's being removed here is because it's ignorant and disrespectful.