3 ms·
Although the point about simple pricing might have been an overwrought Apple-specific intro, the real point is: dayum, what was NYT thinking with this weird, ex
by afterburner 16y ago
Although the point about simple pricing might have been an overwrought Apple-specific intro, the real point is: dayum, what was NYT thinking with this weird, expensive pricing structure? And not even a discount for getting both subplans together?
- Stormbringer 16y agoWait... You're complaining that Gruber is putting an Apple angle on one of his articles? Do you also complain that water is wet darnit?