4 ms·
This is good at first, but I deployed on a very small machine, that couldn't handle the live application + the Docker image being built, thus why I wanted to bu
by Longwelwind 6y ago
This is good at first, but I deployed on a very small machine, that couldn't handle the live application + the Docker image being built, thus why I wanted to build the image in my CI pipelines.
- hardwaresofton 6y ago+1 for this -- requiring the docker image to be built/managed on the machine it's being deployed on is the simpler architectural choice (easier to debug, etc), but it doesn't necessarily make sense for production. I wonder if there's a ticket about this on dokku already [EDIT] - Couldn't find anything... Some tickets about how the containers are built and changing the base image but not much about. I wonder if you could jury rig something like kraken[0] and make sure wherever your building images is a peer or something... Of course the simpler solution might be to add a CI step that just pushes the image (via the working `docker save` method) to the deployment machine(s)? Maybe if you have a staging environment, let CI push there, then if that machine is peered (via something like kraken) with production, production will get the image (though it may never run the image). [0]: https://github.com/uber/kraken https://github.com/uber/kraken
- josegonzalez 6y agoYou can deploy a custom image via the `tags` plugin.