3 ms·
Makes sense. What do you mean by it “came out”? Looks like “x32” was used at least as far back as 2009: http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/office-2010-x64-bit-q
by WalterGR 6y ago
Makes sense. What do you mean by it “came out”?
Looks like “x32” was used at least as far back as 2009: http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/office-2010-x64-bit-qu-t1914261.html http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/office-2010-x64-bit-qu-t191... . Not much earlier than 2011, but just FYI.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> What do you mean by it “came out”? It was announced in August 2011, that's when the code was shown for the first time. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/415 https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/26/415 > Looks like “x32” was used at least as far back as 2009: http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/office-2010-x64-bit-qu-t191.. http://www.utteraccess.com/forum/office-2010-x64-bit-qu-t191.... . This is a great example because that person is confused by these terrible names - they've seen the name x64, and they assume there must be an x32... but there wasn't, back in 2009. They mean 32-bit x86, which is not the same thing as x32.
- WalterGR 6y agoWe’re talking about different things. I’m talking about people using “x32” to refer to x86. Hence my confusion about “x32” “coming out”.