4 ms·
You didn’t even read your own article. A panel member claimed the phone metadata collection program hadn’t saved any lives/foiled any attacks - not that the NS
by theferalrobot 6y ago
You didn’t even read your own article.
A panel member claimed the phone metadata collection program hadn’t saved any lives/foiled any attacks - not that the NSA itself hasn’t.
Additionally they present this as being at odds with the Obama administrations documentation, not a refutation (they didn’t find them to be false claims).
- voxic11 6y agoDid you read your own articles? They specifically are claims that the NSA metadata collection program known as PRISM foiled terrorist attacks. They claim that evidence will not be presented publicly but will be presented to lawmakers. These exact lawmakers claim to never have received such evidence. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/13/senators-challenge-nsa-surveillance-terrorism https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/13/senators-chall...
- theferalrobot 6y ago> No u Lol the article you list was published before the documentation cited was presented (and before my articles were even published) - additionally you are moving the goalposts - the op claim is that the nsa hasn’t foiled any terror plots - not about metadata collection