3 ms·

I think the fact they added the non-compete after is not the issue. Also the fact he was told otherwise prior to relocating. My guess it's a standard thing for

I think the fact they added the non-compete after is not the issue. Also the fact he was told otherwise prior to relocating. My guess it's a standard thing for all US based workers as he was told and there was a "bug" in the process. I doubt it was done intentionally. The issue is the states that allow this to happen. Capitalist America.

wolfi1 6y ago
I read it that way that it was after relocation but before the beginning of the job in Seattle
- tinyhouse 6y ago
  Right, I understand that. All I'm saying it's not the important issue. The important issue is that it's legal in the first place to restrict employees in such ways.